MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

STUDI PREVALENSI KEJADIAN DIARE PADA BAYI PASCA LAHIR DI RSUD DR. SLAMET KABUPATEN GARUT

2011· dissertation· en· W28430465 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ranti Nurwantika

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Quality and Satisfaction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Foundation of KoreaAcademia SinicaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diare merupakan salah satu penyebab kematian bayi terutama di negara berkembang. Diare merupakan penyakit endemis yang diakibatkan oleh bakteri. Diare bayi dipengaruhu oleh beberapa faktor diantarannya faktor berasal dari ibu, bayi dan lingkungan. Kejadian diare yang terjadi di RSU dr. Slamet Kabupaten Garut belum diketahui penyebab pastinya sehingga diperlukan penelitian awal. Penelitian ini bertujuan melihat prevalensi kejadian diare di RSU dr Slamet. Mendeskripsikan faktor-faktor, mendeskripsikan hasil pemeriksaan kualitas mikrobiologi (E.Coli dalam air dan peralatan bayi) dan mendiskripsikan perilaku perawat. Jenis penelitian yang dilakukan adalah deskriptif dengan rancangan cross sectional. Pengambilan data untuk penelitian yaitu semua populasi bayi yang dilahirkan di bulan Oktober-Desember 2010 sebanyak 316 bayi dengan penderita diare sebanyak 100 bayi sehingga prevalensi kejadian sebanyak 31,6%. Keseluruhan sampel responden yang diambil berjumlah 13 orang dan sampel air bersih untuk diperiksa dilaboratorium berjumlah 4 titik. Beberapa faktor yang diduga mempengaruhi kejadian diare adalah kualitas air minum dan peralatan bayi secara mikrobiologi, pemberian susu formula pada bayi, perilaku perawat Kata Kunci: diare, kualitas mikrobiologis air, bayi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicHealthcare Quality and SatisfactionFrench-language works237,207