MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2847806490 · doi:10.1002/jwmg.21502

Salmon poisoning disease in grizzly bears with population recovery implications

2018· article· en· W2847806490 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charles T. Robbins, Nina L. Woodford, Gaylynn Goolsby Clyde, Cody Minor, O. Lynne Nelson, Melissa Brewer, Patrick H. Khalife, Jennifer Hawley

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Wildlife Management · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCollege of Agricultural, Human and Natural Resource Sciences, Washington State University
KeywordsGrizzly BearsUrsusOncorhynchusWildlifePopulationFisheryBiologyGeographyEcologyZoologyEnvironmental healthMedicineFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Wildlife restoration programs depend on having animals that have evolved to handle the constraints, including disease, posed by the new environment. Grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos horribilis ) once thrived while feeding on salmon ( Onchorhynchus spp.) and other foods in California, Oregon, Washington, and Idaho, USA. Unlike Canadian and Alaskan salmon, salmon in lower latitudes often carry an encysted fluke ( Nanophyetus salmincola ) containing an endosymbiont ( Neorickettsia spp.) that can produce a deadly disease in ursids and canids called salmon poisoning disease (SPD). Current recovery plans for grizzly bears in the North Cascades of Washington and the mountains of central Idaho, where infected salmon currently occur, call for using bears from several interior populations. We hypothesized that such bears with no history of salmon consumption will be sensitive to SPD. To test that idea, we fed a limited amount of fresh Chinook salmon ( O. tshawytscha ) harvested from rivers draining the east and west sides of the Cascades to 11 captive grizzly bears in which both parents were from populations with no history of SPD. We detected N. salmincola ova in the feces, and 8 bears exhibited typical SPD symptoms, which included decreased or no appetite, lethargy, vomiting, and diarrhea. We identified N. helminthoeca and Stellantchasmus falcatus (SF) agent ( Neorickettsia sp.) in the salmon, but only SF agent occurred in the sick bears. Stellantchasmus falcatus agent is a relatively new arrival in the Pacific Northwest. Because of the severity of the disease and the potential for mortality without treatment, additional studies should be conducted to determine the distribution and prevalence of SF agent in salmon and kokanee ( O. nerka ) in the recovery area, develop a serum antibody test that could be used to determine exposure of bears to SF agent, and use that test to determine if grizzly bears or American black bears ( U. americanus ) currently living in the Pacific Northwest have been infected and recovered. If either of the latter have occurred, SPD may not prevent the successful restoration of grizzly bears where SF agent‐infected salmon will be consumed. © 2018 The Wildlife Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Wildlife ManagementSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207