MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2847962960 · doi:10.1117/12.2313432

Concept design of the LiteBIRD satellite for CMB B-mode polarization

2018· preprint· en· W2847962960 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yutaro Sekímoto, F. Noviello, Izumi Ota, B. Winter, P. A. R. Ade, A. Mangilli, J. Aumont, Jason Austermann, Carlo Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, Ranajoy Banerji, S. Basak, Shawn Beckman, Marco Bersanelli, Julian Borill, F. Boulanger, Michael Brown, M. Bucher, E. Calabrese, A. Challinor, Y. Chinone, F. Columbro, A. Cukierman, D. Curtis, Paolo de Bernardis, M. De Petris, M. Dobbs, Tadayasu Dotani, L. Duband, Anne Ducout, Ken Ebisawa, T. Elleflot, H. K. Eriksen, Josquin Errand, Raphael Flauger, C. Franceschet, U. Fuskeland, K. Ganga, Jian-Rong Gao, T. Ghigna, J. Grain, A. Gruppuso, Nils Halverson, Peter Hargrave, Takashi Hasebe, M. Hasegawa, M. Hattori, M. Hazumi, S. Henrot–Versillé, Charles Hill, Yukimasa Hirota, E. Hivon, D. Hoang, Johannes Hubmayr, Kiyotomo Ichiki, Hiroaki Imada, H. Ishino, G. Jaehnig, Kam Arnold, Hiroaki Kanai, Shingo Kashima, N. Katayama, Takeo Kawasaki, Rijo Keskitalo, A. Kibayashi, Takahiro Kikuchi, Kimihiro Kimura, T. S. Kisner, Yohei Kobayashi, Nozomu KOGISO, Kazunori Kohri, Eiichiro Komatsu, Kunimoto Komatsu, Kuniaki Konishi, N. Krachmalnicoff, Chao Lin Kuo, Noah Kurinsky, A. Kushino, Luca Lamagna, Adrian V. Lee, E. Linder, M. Maki, E. Martínez-González, Silvia Masi, Tomotakake Matsumura, A. Mennella, Y. Minami, Kazuhisa Mitsuda, D. Molinari, Ludovic Montier, G. Morgante, Baptiste Mot, Yasuhiro Murata, A. Murphy, M. Nagai, Ryo Nagata, Shogo Nakamura, Toshiya Namikawa, Paolo Natoli, Toshiyuki Nishibori, H. Nishino, Créidhe O’Sullivan, Hiroki Ochi, Hideo Ogawa, Hiroyuki Ogawa, Hiroyuki Ohsaki, Nozomi Okada, F. Piacentini, G. Pisano, G. Polenta, D. Poletti, Giuseppe Puglisi, Christopher Raum, M. Remazeilles, Haruyuki Sakurai, Y. Sakurai, Giorgio Savini, Blake D. Sherwin, Keisuke Shinozaki, Maresuke Shiraishi, G. Signorelli, G. Smecher, Hajime Sugai, S. Sugiyama, Aritoki Suzuki, Jun‐ichi Suzuki, Ryota Takaku, Hayato Takakura, S. Takakura, Ellen Taylor, Keith L. Thompson, B. Thorne, Maurizio Tomasi, Hiroshi Tomida, N. Trappe, M. Tristram, Masatoshi Tsuji, Masahiro Tsujimoto, Satoru Uozumi, Shin Utsunomiya, N. Vittorio, Naoki WATANABE, Ingunn Wehus, Benjamin Westbrook, R. Yamamoto, Noriko Y. Yamasaki, Masato Yanagisawa, Tetsuya Yoshida, Junji Yumoto, M. Zannoni, A. Zonca, Yuichiro Kataoka, Guillaume Patanchon, S. Realini

Bibliographic record

VenueSpace Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsThree-Speed Logic (Canada)McGill University
FundersJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceScience and Technology Facilities CouncilMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsCosmic microwave backgroundPolarization (electrochemistry)SatelliteComputer scienceMode (computer interface)Satellite broadcastingRemote sensingPhysicsAstronomyOpticsGeologyHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LiteBIRD is a candidate for JAXA's strategic large mission to observe the cosmic microwave background (CMB) polarization over the full sky at large angular scales. It is planned to be launched in the 2020s with an H3 launch vehicle for three years of observations at a Sun-Earth Lagrangian point (L2). The concept design has been studied by researchers from Japan, U.S., Canada and Europe during the ISAS Phase-A1. Large scale measurements of the CMB B-mode polarization are known as the best probe to detect primordial gravitational waves. The goal of LiteBIRD is to measure the tensor-to-scalar ratio (r) with precision of r < 0:001. A 3-year full sky survey will be carried out with a low frequency (34 - 161 GHz) telescope (LFT) and a high frequency (89 - 448 GHz) telescope (HFT), which achieve a sensitivity of 2.5 μK-arcmin with an angular resolution 30 arcminutes around 100 GHz. The concept design of LiteBIRD system, payload module (PLM), cryo-structure, LFT and verification plan is described in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpace Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter WaveSame topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207