MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identities and New Market Categories

2018· article· en· W2850127061 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert J. David, Nelson Phillips

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Organizational Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFraming (construction)LegitimationStakeholderSociologySocial identity theoryPerceptionPublic relationsEntrepreneurshipIdentity (music)MarketingPolitical scienceEpistemologySocial scienceBusinessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New market categories arise from a process of social construction through which a collection of objects come to be perceived to be “of the same type” (Navis and Glynn, 2010). Despite the recognition that identities are central to market categories, much remains to be learned about the relationship between these two constructs. Do categories require a clear and coherent collective identity to gain legitimation? How do the identities associated with social movements become instantiated in market categories? How are perceptions of authenticity for market categories related to the identities of audiences, products, and organizations? The proposed symposium brings together new qualitative and quantitative research that addresses these questions among others. More specifically, it presents four studies that explore the antecedents and consequences of identities in new market categories and the organizations that comprise them. Following the paper presentations, Nelson Phillips will serve as discussant. In addition to making paper-specific comments, Phillips will draw on his vast array of research experience related to institutional theory, collective action, entrepreneurship, and market dynamics to highlight key points of commonality and divergence across the papers and chart avenues for future research. His discussant comments will have a specific focus on highlighting the papers’ implications for management theory and practice (e.g., entrepreneurship and strategy). Phillips will then lead an active audience discussion of the studies and their implications. Stakeholder Framing Contests and Entrepreneurial Identity in New Market Categories Presenter: Shon R. Hiatt; U. of Southern California Presenter: W Chad Carlos; Brigham Young U. How Vegan Are You? Audiences Value Orientation and Identity Congruence in a New Market Category Presenter: Eunice Yunjin Rhee; Seattle U. Presenter: Jade Lo; Drexel U. When change leads to conflict:Collective identity threats & the evolution of movement-driven market Presenter: Jocelyn M. Leitzinger; U. of Illinois at Chicago Artisans of Authenticity: Identity Construction and the Emergence of New Market Categories Presenter: Johnny Boghossian; Laval U. Presenter: Robert J. David; McGill U.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicManagement and Organizational StudiesFrench-language works237,207