Comparative population biology and reproduction of two sympatric crabs (Grapsidae) on Azores cobble beaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Population biology of the intertidal crabs Pachygrapsus marmoratus Fabricius, 1787 and P. maurus (Lucas 1846) was investigated at cobble beaches with different levels of wave exposure. Surveys were taken monthly over 1.5 years at three intertidal levels. The growth rate of both species was similar, although P. marmoratus reached larger sizes. This species was more abundant on the mid-littoral zone of sheltered beaches, whereas P. maurus was more abundant on more exposed ones. The sex ratio was male biased in both species, particularly for the smaller and larger size classes. Both species showed an extended reproductive season, coinciding with the rising temperatures of spring and summer, with ovigerous females being found from June to September for P. marmoratus and from May to August for P. maurus. The present study indicates that both could develop adaptive strategies allowing them to coexist in the Azores littoral. The greater size of P. marmoratus seems to be an advantage on the competition for refuges with P. maurus, which results in its higher abundance and general dominance in the higher shore levels and in less exposed shores. However, P. maurus seems to be more fitted to live in the higher hydrodynamic habitats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".