MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W28561856 · doi:10.1039/c7mt00133a

La prévalence du paludisme chez les enfants de moins de cinq ans au Sénégal : prévention et traitement

2012· dissertation· en· W28561856 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Alain Nicodème Yehouessi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsGynecologyProtozoal diseaseMedicineHumanitiesMalariaArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 2000, au Senegal, chez les enfants de moins de cinq ans, la prevalence palustre est de 30%, tandis qu'en 2001 la morbidite palustre proportionnelle est de 33,6% (PNLP ; 2009). Les resultats de notre etude sur la prevalence du paludisme chez les enfants de moins de cinq ans au Senegal montrent que celle-ci baisse significativement passant de 30% en 2000 a 5,6% en 2008. Plus specifiquement, a travers cette etude nous montrons que la prevalence du paludisme baisse significativement chez les enfants de moins d'un an. La prevalence du paludisme chez les enfants de moins de cinq ans au Senegal est significativement en relation avec leur milieu de residence, le niveau d'aisance economique des parents, le niveau d'instruction de la mere. Davantage de menages possedent des moustiques impregnees. L'automedication est en progression, tandis que la medecine traditionnelle continue d'exister. Les combinaisons therapeutiques d'artemisinine (CTA) qui constituent en l'etat actuelle meilleur traitement ne sont pas souvent administrees aux enfants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMalaria Research and Control→French-language works237,207→