MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2856984334 · doi:10.5206/mfds-ecfw.v3i1.4368

Mickey et Voltaire : commentaire de lecture de Garry Apgar, Mickey Mouse Emblem of the American Spirit

2018· article· fr· W2856984334 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Servanne Woodward

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Monde français du dix-huitième siècle · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtEmblemHumanitiesLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rapport sur « Garry APGAR. Mickey Mouse Emblem of the American Spirit. San Francisco, CA: The Walt Disney Family Foundation Press, 2014; reprint 2016 » La biographie de Mickey Mouse ne commence pas avec Walt Disney, mais dans l’illustration des fables d’Esope, de La Fontaine et Andersen et sous l’impression de caricaturistes tel J. J. Grandville (1803-1847) plantant des têtes animales sur des dandys. Autour de 1827, le Suisse Rodolphe Töpffer serait l’inventeur de la bande dessinée, et après Daumier caricaturiste, il faudrait attendre 1910 et le « Krazy Kat » de George Herriman pour trouver une caricature animale plutôt qu’humaine. Un rapport de l’historique de la culture populaire iconique de Mickey Mouse, héro américain héritier d’une longue généalogie que Garry Apgar nous découvre avec la plus grande érudition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0080.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe Monde français du dix-huitième siècleSame topicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207