An Open‐Label, Multicentre Pilot Study of Bosentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Related to Congenital Heart Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bosentan has been shown to be a safe and efficacious treatment for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and PAH associated with connective tissue disease. However, there are limited studies examining the benefits of bosentan in PAH associated with congenital heart disease (CHD). OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present pilot study was to explore the safety and efficacy of bosentan in patients with PAH associated with CHD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the present study, 11 patients with PAH associated with CHD were enrolled to receive bosentan for a minimum of 16 weeks (62.5 mg twice a day for four weeks; thereafter 125 mg twice a day). Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events, oxygen saturation, systemic blood pressure, pulse, complete blood count and liver function tests. Efficacy was assessed by the World Health Organization functional class, 6 min walk test (6-MWT), modified Borg dyspnea index, echocardiography and the 36-item short form health survey. RESULTS: Ten patients completed the 16-week treatment period (one patient withdrew). Bosentan was not associated with a deterioration in resting oxygen saturation (83.0+/-4.6% at week 16 versus 81.9+/-6.1% at baseline; P = 0.402), or a deterioration in post-6-MWT oxygen saturation (70.1+/-10.9% at week 16 versus 68.7+/-15.1% at baseline; P = 0.747). Two patients experienced three serious adverse events. The distance walked in 6 min improved significantly by 28 m (P = 0.005) at week 16 compared with baseline, and the modified Borg dyspnea index also improved at week 16 compared with baseline (P = 0.050). The World Health Organization functional class improved from class III to class II for five of 10 patients (50%). Patients' self-rated quality of life (36-item short form health survey) demonstrated a nonsignificant improvement in each of the eight domains. Obtaining reliable echocardiographic measurements was difficult. Most echocardiographic parameters were only measurable on few patients, and none were measured on all patients, questioning the usefulness of echocardiography as a measuring tool for patients with complex CHD. CONCLUSION: Bosentan was not associated with worsening of resting oxygen saturation or exercise systemic oxygen saturation, suggesting its potential as a safe treatment option for patients with PAH associated with CHD. Improved 6-MWT and the modified Borg dyspnea index also suggested the possibility of bosentan as an efficacious treatment option for these patients. The results of the present study provide evidence for the need and feasibility of a large randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".