MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2861304106 · doi:10.25000/acem.416704

Assessment of the role of EGF +61A/G and EGFR R497K polymorphism in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A case-control study

2018· article· en· W2861304106 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Resul Kahraman, Elif Sinem İplik, Turan Çalhan, Abdurrahman Şahin, Bedia Çakmakoğlu

Bibliographic record

VenueARCHIVES OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpidermal growth factorInflammatory bowel diseaseMedicineGenotypeUlcerative colitisDiseaseAlleleInternal medicineCrohn's diseaseEpidermal growth factor receptorGastroenterologyTumor necrosis factor alphaApoptosisCase-control studyImmunologyReceptorBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim: Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) play an important role in the regulation of cell growth, survival, migration, apoptosis, proliferation, and differentiation. We aimed to investigate the presence of EGF (+61A/G) and EGFR R497Kpolymorphisms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and their associations with clinical features of the patients.Methods: This case-control study included 91 IBD patients (45 Crohn’s disease (CD) patients and 46 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients) and 129 healthy controls (HC). EGF and EGFR were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism techniques to elucidate their association with clinical outcomes. The disease activity for UC and CD were assessed by Truelove-Witts index (TW) and Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI), respectively. The Montreal classification was used for disease involvement and behavior.Results: EGFR497 AA genotype was significantly decreased in patients with UC compared with CD and HC. In addition, the patients with UC who had EGF +61 A allele had increased risk of moderate and severe disease (p=0.28; OR= 3.13; 95% CI=0.34-28.73). The patients with CD who had the EGF61 AG genotype were found to increased risk for the presence of penetrating disease (p=0.14; χ2=5.59; OR=5.00; 95% CI=1.26-19.83). EGF +61 A genotype carriers also had higher CDAI scores (p=0.19; OR=4.00; 95% CI=0.44-36.14). In addition, A+ carriers were also found to have higher requirement for anti-TNF treatment (p=0.11; OR=5.0; 95% CI=0.56-44.4). Conclusion: In this study, EGFR 497 AA genotype was found to decrease significantly in patients with UC compared to HC and CD patients. To enlighten the mechanism, further studies with larger sample groups are needed to clarify the role of the EGF (+61A/G) and EGFR R497K genes polymorphism, and development of the etiology and pathogenesis of IBD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueARCHIVES OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→