MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2861889687 · doi:10.1111/pcmr.12723

Cellular localization of the K<sup>+</sup>‐dependent Na<sup>+</sup>–Ca<sup>2+</sup> exchanger <scp>NCKX</scp>5 and the role of the cytoplasmic loop in its distribution in pigmented cells

2018· article· en· W2861889687 on OpenAlexafffund
Tatiana P. Rogasevskaia, Robert T. Szerencsei, Ali H. Jalloul, Frank Visser, Robert J. Winkfein, Paul P. M. Schnetkamp

Bibliographic record

VenuePigment Cell & Melanoma Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsMount Royal UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCytoplasmChemistryDistribution (mathematics)Anion exchangerBiophysicsIon exchangeRadiochemistryBiochemistryIonBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

exchanger, which belongs to the SLC24A gene family. In particular, the A111T mutation of NCKX5 has been associated with reduced pigmentation in European populations. In contrast to other NCKX isoforms, which function in the plasma membrane (PM), NCKX5 has been shown to localize either in the trans-Golgi network (TGN) or in melanosomes. Moreover, sequences responsible for retaining its intracellular localization are unknown. This study addresses two major questions: (i) clarification of intracellular location of NCKX5 and (ii) identification of sequences that retain NCKX5 inside the cell. We designed a set of cDNA constructs representing NCKX5 loop deletion mutants and NCKX2-NCKX5 chimeras to address these two questions after expression in pigmented MNT1 cells. Our results show that NCKX5 is not a PM resident and is exclusively located in the TGN. Moreover, the large cytoplasmic loop is the determinant for retaining NCKX5 in the TGN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePigment Cell & Melanoma ResearchSame topicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207