MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2864057167 · doi:10.1097/mbp.0000000000000339

Association of systolic blood pressure with cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients with hypertension in Northern China

2018· article· en· W2864057167 on OpenAlex
Xiaobin Guo, Yesong Liu, Nan Yang, Ping Liu, Ying Zhu, Xiaoshuang Xia, Wenxia Yu, Chumin Zhao, Lin Wang, Shouling Wu, Xin Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Pressure Monitoring · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsNutrasource
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioInternal medicineBlood pressureMyocardial infarctionStroke (engine)Incidence (geometry)Confidence intervalCardiologyProspective cohort studyCohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the association of systolic blood pressure (SBP) with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality among elderly hypertensive patients in northern China. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 9655 elderly hypertensive patients from Kailuan study were followed up with the incidence of primary outcomes (composite outcomes including myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause death) and the incidence of secondary outcomes (stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause death). Patients were categorized into five groups on the basis of SBP levels: Q1 (SBP<130 mmHg), Q2 (130≤SBP<140 mmHg), Q3 (140≤SBP<150 mmHg), Q4 (150≤SBP<160 mmHg), and Q5 (SBP≥160 mmHg). RESULTS: During an average of 7.2±1.6 years of follow-up, patients in the group Q2 had the lowest incidence rates of composite outcomes. Q1 was not associated with a decreased risk of composite outcomes. Interestingly, compared with reference group Q2, the risk of composite outcomes [hazard ratio (HR): 1.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.75] was significantly increased in the Q3 subgroup with high risk+very high risk for the incidence of ischemic cardiovascular disease (ICVD). Similarly, the risk of composite outcomes (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.01-1.53 and HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.04-1.75) was significantly increased in Q4 subgroups, with both intermediate risk and high risk+very high risk for 10-year ICVD. CONCLUSION: Elderly hypertensive patients with a high risk of 10-year ICVD were still at a higher risk of developing adverse outcomes even with 140≤SBP<150 mmHg. SBP of less than 130 mmHg was not associated significantly with a reduced risk of developing adverse outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it