MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2867500282 · doi:10.1002/nau.23723

Pelvic floor dysfunction in women with fibromyalgia and control subjects: Prevalence and impact on overall symptomatology and psychosocial function

2018· article· en· W2867500282 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Dolores Carrillo‐Izquierdo, Mahmoud Slim, Javier Hidalgo‐Tallon, Elena P. Calandre

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurourology and Urodynamics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibromyalgiaMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)PsychosocialDistressPhysical therapyPelvic floorMoodPopulationDepression (economics)Sleep disorderPsychiatryInsomniaClinical psychologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims To evaluate the prevalence, distress, and impact of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) symptomatology in women with fibromyalgia and control women. We also aimed to evaluate the impact of PFD symptomatology on several psychosocial measures such as mood, sleep, pain, and quality of life. Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional study in women with fibromyalgia and control women from the general population. Using a structured survey, we collected sociodemographic and clinical data, assessed the prevalence of PFD and evaluated the distress (PFDI‐20) and the impact (PFIQ‐7) caused by its symptomatology. Using Spanish‐validated questionnaires, we also evaluated mood and sleep disturbances, bodily pain, and quality of life in subjects with and without PFD. In participants with fibromyalgia, we assessed the severity and impact of the disease using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR). Results Two hundred and twenty‐six patients with fibromyalgia and 222 control women completed the surveys. Two hundred and twenty patients (93%) and 140 controls (63%) reported PFD‐related symptoms. Both the scores of distress (143.1 ± 5.7 vs 96.1 ± 4.8, P < 0.0001) and impact (122.4 ± 5.6 vs 100.6 ± 6.4, P < 0.0001) caused by PFD symptoms were significantly higher in women with fibromyalgia than in controls. There was a significant positive relationship between fibromyalgia severity and both PFDI‐20 (r2 = 0.32, P < 0.0001) and PFIQ‐7 scores (r2 = 0.375, P < 0.0001). Depression severity, sleep disturbances, bodily pain, and low quality of life were highest in women with fibromyalgia and PFD and lowest in control women without PFD. Conclusions PFD‐related symptoms were significantly more frequent in women with fibromyalgia than in controls. PFD symptomatology, when present, negatively influenced mood, sleep quality, and quality of life of both patients with fibromyalgia and controls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurourology and UrodynamicsSame topicFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchFrench-language works237,207