Preservative Effects of Strobilurin Fungicides on Citrus Storage Diseases and Residue Safety Assessment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ethofenprox, pyraclostrobine, trifloxystrobin and enestroburin are strobilurin fungicides that can effectively control fungal diseases caused by ascomycetes, zygomycetes, imperfect fungi, etc. With the purpose of guaranteeing the safe use of strobilurin fungicides in the prevention and treatment of citrus diseases, toxicity and control effects of the fungicides on citrus storage diseases and GC-MS (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) were applied in this study to determine its residual safety. The results indicated that ethofenprox, trifloxystrobin, pyraclostrobine, and enestroburin had excellent inhibitory effects on citrus storage diseases at concentration of 200-400 ug/mL. Degradation dynamics of 4 fungicides during the storage period of citrus could be expressed as the first-order kinetics equation. The fungicides could penetrate into flesh through peels slowly. Therefore, the residue content of the fungicide on peels was higher than that in the flesh of the same citrus. After citrus fruits were treated for 90 d, the residues were lower than the maximum residue limits in all the countries, so the citrus were safe. This investigation provided the theoretical guidance and technical support for the quality evaluation of citrus products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".