MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2868355673 · doi:10.1101/365205

Analysis of head and neck carcinoma progression reveals novel and relevant stage-specific changes associated with immortalisation and malignancy

2018· preprint· en· W2868355673 on OpenAlexaff
Ratna Veeramachaneni, Thomas D. J. Walker, Antoine de Weck, Timothée Revil, Dunarel Badescu, J O'Sullivan, Catherine Higgins, Louise Elliott, Triantafillos Liloglou, Janet M. Risk, Richard Shaw, Lynne Hampson, Ian Hampson, Simon Dearden, Robert Woodwards, Stephen S. Prime, Keith D. Hunter, Eric Kenneth Parkinson, Jiannis Ragoussis, Nalin Thakker

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCDKN2AHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaBiologyCancer researchFHITCarcinogenesisMalignancyCancerHead and neck cancerTumor suppressor geneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a widely prevalent cancer globally with high mortality and morbidity. We report here changes in the genomic landscape in the development of HNSCC from potentially premalignant lesions (PPOLS) to malignancy and lymph node metastases. Frequent likely pathological mutations are restricted to a relatively small set of genes including TP53, CDKN2A , FBXW7 , FAT1 , NOTCH1 and KMT2D ; these arise early in tumour progression and are present in PPOLs with NOTCH1 mutations restricted to cell lines from lesions that subsequently progressed to HNSCC. The most frequent genetic changes are of consistent somatic copy number alterations (SCNA). The earliest SCNAs involved deletions of CSMD1 (8p23.2), FHIT (3p14.2) and CDKN2A (9p21.3) together with gains of chromosome 20. CSMD1 deletions or promoter hypermethylation were present in all of the immortal PPOLs and occurred at high frequency in the immortal HNSCC cell lines (promoter hypermethylation ~63%, hemizygous deletions ~75%, homozygous deletions ~18%). Forced expression of CSMD1 in the HNSCC cell line H103 showed significant suppression of proliferation (p=0.0053) and invasion in vitro (p=5.98X10 −5 ) supporting a role for CSMD1 inactivation in early head and neck carcinogenesis. In addition, knockdown of CSMD1 in the CSMD1 -expressing BICR16 cell line showed significant stimulation of invasion in vitro (p=1.82 x 10 −5 ) but not cell proliferation (p=0.239). HNSCC with and without nodal metastases showed some clear differences including high copy number gains of CCND1 , hsa-miR-548k and TP63 in the metastases group. GISTIC peak SCNA regions showed significant enrichment (adj P<0.01) of genes in multiple KEGG cancer pathways at all stages with disruption of an increasing number of these involved in the progression to lymph node metastases. Sixty-seven genes from regions with statistically significant differences in SCNA/LOH frequency between immortal PPOL and HNSCC cell lines showed correlation with expression including 5 known cancer drivers. Lay Summary Cancers affecting the head and neck region are relatively common. A large percentage of these are of one particular type; these are generally detected late and are associated with poor prognosis. Early detection and treatment dramatically improve survival and reduces the damage associated with the cancer and its treatment. Cancers arise and progress because of changes in the genetic material of the cells. This study focused on identifying such changes in these cancers particularly in the early stages of development, which are not fully known. Identification of these changes is important in developing new treatments as well as markers of behaviour of cancers and also the early or ‘premalignant’ lesions. We used a well-characterised panel of cell lines generated from premalignant lesions as well as cancers, to identify mutations in genes, and an increase or decrease in number of copies of genes. We mapped new and previously identified changes in these cancers to specific stages in the development of these cancers and their spread. We additionally report here for the first time, alterations in CSMD1 gene in early premalignant lesions; we further show that this is likely to result in increased ability of the cells to spread and possibly, multiply faster as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→