Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alfonsas Eidintas. Jews, Lithuanians and the Holocaust. Vilnius: Versus Aureus, 2003. 534 pp. Photographs . Bibliography. Index.Important changes in the interpretation of the Holocaust in have only recently begun. Alfonsas Eidintas, a Lithuanian historian, points out that investigating this sensitive subject-the history of the Holocaust in Lithuania-was quite difficult, since the perpetrator was more often than not Lithuanian (p. 13) and, furthermore, disagreement regarding this fact still exists there. Eidintas acknowledges that the role of the shooter is not something that we, Lithuanians like to talk about, although we all understand and know just how dirty a job was done by this person, and under whose command(p. 13). However, he provides a full account of the Catastrophe that was truer than true (p. 11).Jews, Lithuanians and the Holocaust is especially significant since it is the first comprehensive and sincere history of the Holocaust in Lithuania, and an effective way to get back in touch with the darkest page of Lithuanian modern history. The author addresses the subject as an objective storyteller and reflects on a current problem-the issue of the open wound, i.e., the difficult dialogue between Lithuanians and Jews. From this point of view, the work is not only history but also political scicnee.The first chapter focuses on the attitude toward the Jews among different Lithuanian social groups from the late nineteenth century to the post-Second World War era. Rather than providing a general history of Lithuanian Jews, Eidintas describes the escalation of anti-Semitism. he outlines the negative attitude of the church and nationalistic press, which not only displayed economic anti-Semitism, but also manifested racist ideology (pp. 34, 43). Eidintas concludes that a non-radical anti-Semitism increased during the interwar period (1918-1940) and was widely spread among ethnic Lithuanians. In a balanced way, the author observes the political role of the Jews during the first year of Soviet regime ( 1940-1941 ). he reveals the myth that Jews betrayed the nation of Lithuania (p. 145) and rejects their identification with Bolshevism. This provides historical background of the Holocaust in Lithuania.In the second chapter, Eidintas investigates Lithuanians' collaboration with the Nazis, their role in the mass murder of the Jews, and what historical circumstances determined such collaboration. he explains how the Jews were brutally murdered by the Lithuanian militias and often by their own neighbours.The book poses the question: could the Jews in have been rescued? Eidintas does not answer it, but he illustrates, with many stories, acts of kindness by Lithuanians toward the Jews (p. 329). In the hostile environment of the time, it took a great deal of heroic efforts, risk and sacrifice to rescue a Jewish family. The concluding chapter of the book deals with the complex dialogue between Lithuanians and the Jews in the post-Holocaust period and discusses the possibilities and means of reconciliation. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it