MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W287457649

Jews, Lithuanians and the Holocaust

2004· article· en· W287457649 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sara Ginaite

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe HolocaustLithuanianSubject (documents)World War IIPoliticsHistoryInterpretation (philosophy)Religious studiesClassicsLawPolitical sciencePhilosophyComputer scienceLibrary science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alfonsas Eidintas. Jews, Lithuanians and the Holocaust. Vilnius: Versus Aureus, 2003. 534 pp. Photographs . Bibliography. Index.Important changes in the interpretation of the Holocaust in have only recently begun. Alfonsas Eidintas, a Lithuanian historian, points out that investigating this sensitive subject-the history of the Holocaust in Lithuania-was quite difficult, since the perpetrator was more often than not Lithuanian (p. 13) and, furthermore, disagreement regarding this fact still exists there. Eidintas acknowledges that the role of the shooter is not something that we, Lithuanians like to talk about, although we all understand and know just how dirty a job was done by this person, and under whose command(p. 13). However, he provides a full account of the Catastrophe that was truer than true (p. 11).Jews, Lithuanians and the Holocaust is especially significant since it is the first comprehensive and sincere history of the Holocaust in Lithuania, and an effective way to get back in touch with the darkest page of Lithuanian modern history. The author addresses the subject as an objective storyteller and reflects on a current problem-the issue of the open wound, i.e., the difficult dialogue between Lithuanians and Jews. From this point of view, the work is not only history but also political scicnee.The first chapter focuses on the attitude toward the Jews among different Lithuanian social groups from the late nineteenth century to the post-Second World War era. Rather than providing a general history of Lithuanian Jews, Eidintas describes the escalation of anti-Semitism. he outlines the negative attitude of the church and nationalistic press, which not only displayed economic anti-Semitism, but also manifested racist ideology (pp. 34, 43). Eidintas concludes that a non-radical anti-Semitism increased during the interwar period (1918-1940) and was widely spread among ethnic Lithuanians. In a balanced way, the author observes the political role of the Jews during the first year of Soviet regime ( 1940-1941 ). he reveals the myth that Jews betrayed the nation of Lithuania (p. 145) and rejects their identification with Bolshevism. This provides historical background of the Holocaust in Lithuania.In the second chapter, Eidintas investigates Lithuanians' collaboration with the Nazis, their role in the mass murder of the Jews, and what historical circumstances determined such collaboration. he explains how the Jews were brutally murdered by the Lithuanian militias and often by their own neighbours.The book poses the question: could the Jews in have been rescued? Eidintas does not answer it, but he illustrates, with many stories, acts of kindness by Lithuanians toward the Jews (p. 329). In the hostile environment of the time, it took a great deal of heroic efforts, risk and sacrifice to rescue a Jewish family. The concluding chapter of the book deals with the complex dialogue between Lithuanians and the Jews in the post-Holocaust period and discusses the possibilities and means of reconciliation. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Slavonic PapersSame topicHistorical Geopolitical and Social DynamicsFrench-language works237,207