In vitro characterization of neonatal, juvenile, and adult porcine islet oxygen demand, β‐cell function, and transcriptomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is currently a shortage of human donor pancreata which limits the broad application of islet transplantation as a treatment for type 1 diabetes. Porcine islets have demonstrated potential as an alternative source, but a study evaluating islets from different donor ages under unified protocols has yet to be conducted. METHODS: Neonatal porcine islets (NPI; 1-3 days), juvenile porcine islets (JPI; 18-21 days), and adult porcine islets (API; 2+ years) were compared in vitro, including assessments of oxygen consumption rate, membrane integrity determined by FDA/PI staining, β-cell proliferation, dynamic glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and RNA sequencing. RESULTS: Oxygen consumption rate normalized to DNA was not significantly different between ages. Membrane integrity was age dependent, and API had the highest percentage of intact cells. API also had the highest glucose-stimulated insulin secretion response during a dynamic insulin secretion assay and had 50-fold higher total insulin content compared to NPI and JPI. NPI and JPI had similar glucose responsiveness, β-cell percentage, and β-cell proliferation rate. Transcriptome analysis was consistent with physiological assessments. API transcriptomes were enriched for cellular metabolic and insulin secretory pathways, while NPI exhibited higher expression of genes associated with proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: The oxygen demand, membrane integrity, β-cell function and proliferation, and transcriptomes of islets from API, JPI, and NPI provide a comprehensive physiological comparison for future studies. These assessments will inform the optimal application of each age of porcine islet to expand the availability of islet transplantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".