Supplementation of Type 1 Diabetic Rats with Carrot Powder Lowers Blood Glucose without Improving Cardiac Structure and Function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foods and food bioactives have shown to be effective in preventing some human disease conditions. In this study, we examined the effects of carrot powder, rich in carotenoids, as a dietary supplement for the prevention of cardiac anomalies in streptozotocin (STZ) induced type 1 diabetic rats. Male Wistar rats were fed either control or carrot powder containing diet for 3 weeks. Type 1 diabetes was induced with STZ injection (65 mg/kg body weight) in half of the rats in each group. All rats were continued on their respective diet for a further 9 weeks. Cardiac structural and functional parameters were measured using echocardiography at 8 weeks post STZ administration. In comparison to non-diabetic rats, diabetic rats showed significant increase in isovolumetric relaxation time and a significant decrease in systolic function parameter, cardiac output. Left ventricular internal dimension and left ventricular posterior wall thickness were significantly higher in diabetic animals. Blood glucose levels were significantly lower in carrot supplemented diabetic rats when compared with non-treated diabetic rats. Diabetic rats treated and untreated had elevated level of lipid peroxidation. Catalase levels were significantly elevated in the carrot powder supplemented diabetic rats when compared to the control rats. Carrot supplementation lowered blood glucose levels significantly but did not normalize it to control levels. It had no effect on cardiac abnormalities and anti-oxidant status in rats with type 1 diabetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".