Molecular Profiling of Salivary Gland Intraductal Carcinoma Revealed a Subset of Tumors Harboring NCOA4-RET and Novel TRIM27-RET Fusions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intraductal carcinoma (IC) is the new World Health Organization designation for tumors previously called "low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma" and "low-grade salivary duct carcinoma." The relationship of IC to salivary duct carcinoma is controversial, but they now are considered to be distinct entities. IC is a rare low-grade malignant salivary gland neoplasm with features similar to mammary atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ, that shows diffuse S100 protein and mammaglobin positivity and is only partially defined genetically. (Mammary analogue) secretory carcinoma harboring ETV6-NTRK3, and in rare cases ETV6-RET fusion, shares histomorphologic and immunophenotypical features with IC. Recently, RET rearrangements and NCOA4-RET have been described in IC, suggesting a partial genetic overlap with mammary analogue secretory carcinoma. Here, we genetically characterize the largest cohort of IC to date to further explore this relationship. Seventeen cases of IC were analyzed by next-generation sequencing using the FusionPlex Solid Tumor kit (ArcherDX). Identified fusions were confirmed using fluorescence in situ hybridization break apart and, in some cases, fusion probes, and a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction designed specifically to the detected breakpoints. All analyzed cases were known to be negative for ETV6 rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization and for ETV6-NTRK3 fusion by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Next-generation sequencing analysis detected a NCOA4-RET fusion transcript joining exon 7 or 8 of NCOA4 gene and exon 12 of RET gene in 6 cases of intercalated duct type IC; and a novel TRIM27-RET fusion transcript between exons 3 and 12 in 2 cases of salivary gland tumors displaying histologic and immunohistochemical features typical of apocrine IC. A total of 47% of IC harbored a fusion involving RET. In conclusion, we have confirmed the presence of NCOA4-RET as the dominant fusion in intercalated duct type IC. A novel finding in our study has been a discovery of a subset of IC patients with apocrine variant IC harboring a novel TRIM27-RET.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".