Non-radiative mid-range wireless power transfer: An experiment for senior physics undergraduates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A wireless power transfer experiment suitable for senior physics undergraduates is described and demonstrated in detail. The apparatus, which operates between 3 and 4 MHz, consists of a pair of identical resonant coils that can be moved relative to one another. A signal generator circuit is inductively coupled to the transmitting coil using a single loop of wire. Likewise, a single loop of wire couples the receiving coil to a load impedance. We use a matching circuit to tune the impedance of the system of coupled resonators to match the 50-Ω output impedance of the signal generator and a low-cost vector network analyzer to characterize the system performance as the distance between the pair of coils is changed. We find that when the distance between the transmitting and receiving coils is small, a double resonance emerges and that the frequency difference between the pair resonances is inversely proportional to the distance between the coils. After fully characterizing the system, it can be operated up to an incident power of 20 W. Our measurements reveal that, at weak coupling, the fraction of the incident power lost to radiation increases linearly with the distance between the coils. Finally, we demonstrate that the system is able to transmit enough power to dimly light a 60-W incandescent light bulb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".