MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883365013 · doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000001034

Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy (GATT) in Postpenetrating Keratoplasty Steroid-induced Glaucoma: A Case Report

2018· article· en· W2883365013 on OpenAlexaff
Samir Nazarali, Stéphanie Côté, Patrick Gooi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Glaucoma · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryWestern UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGlaucomaIntraocular pressureGonioscopyOphthalmologyGlaucoma surgeryPhacoemulsificationVisual acuityTrabeculectomySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glaucoma following penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) remains the leading cause of blindness following PKP. Patients with post-PKP glaucoma can be managed medically and surgically. Evidence studying glaucoma surgical techniques following PKP is limited, but suggests the possibility for high-risk complications, including graft failure. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries offer an alternative. We report the first case of post-PKP glaucoma managed with gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT). The patient was a 33-year-old man with a history of keratoconus who underwent PKP in his right eye. On presentation, his visual acuity was 20/60 and intraocular pressure was 48 mm Hg OD. He underwent GATT and cataract phacoemulsification. Following 22 months of follow-up, the patient's visual acuity was 20/30 and intraocular pressure 13 mm Hg, off all glaucoma medications. This case demonstrates GATT may be a good surgical option for post-PKP glaucoma, given the ability to perform future incisional surgery and avoidance of high-risk complications associated with traditional glaucoma surgeries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of GlaucomaSame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207