MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

POLO: A randomized phase III trial of olaparib maintenance monotherapy in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) who have a germline <i>BRCA1/2</i> mutation (g<i>BRCA</i>m).

2016· article· en· W2883374837 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Talia Golan, Do‐Youn Oh, Michele Reni, Teresa Macarulla, Giampaolo Tortora, Michael J. Hall, Anke Reinacher‐Schick, Christophe Borg, Daniel Hochhauser, Thomas Walter, Howard S. Höchster, Nigel Baker, Gershon Y. Locker, Hedy L. Kindler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlaparibMedicinePARP inhibitorInternal medicineClinical endpointBRCA mutationOncologyPopulationRegimenCancerPhases of clinical researchOvarian cancerSurgeryRandomized controlled trialChemotherapyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS4152 Background: Defective double-strand DNA break repair caused by a gBRCAm is a risk factor for mPC. In the general population of mPC pts, the prevalence of a gBRCAm may be around 4.5%; but, in some populations of mPC pts, such as Ashkenazi Jews, the prevalence could be up to 15%. Monotherapy with the PARP inhibitor olaparib (Lynparza) has led to tumor responses in a Phase II trial that enrolled gBRCAm pts with a variety of solid tumor types, including in pts with mPC (Kaufman et al JCO 2014: Study 42; NCT01078662). This trial supported preclinical data showing that gBRCAm-defective tumors are intrinsically sensitive to PARP inhibitors, and led to a double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III trial (NCT02184195; POLO) of olaparib ‘switch maintenance’ monotherapy in pts with mPC and a gBRCAm who have not progressed on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: Eligible pts with mPC must have documented disease control after completing ≥16 weeks of a first-line, platinum-based regimen, with a deleterious gBRCAm, which will be assayed and confirmed by Integrated BRACAnalysis (Myriad Genetic Laboratories) during the trial. Pts are randomized (3:2) to olaparib tablets (300 mg orally bd) or placebo. The primary endpoint is PFS, determined by blinded independent central review using RECIST 1.1. The primary PFS analysis will be performed after ≈87 PFS events (≈60% maturity) using a log-rank test. Enrollment began in Q4 2014. As of 16 January 2016, 635 pts have been screened. Of 590 pts for whom BRCA1/2 mutation testing results are currently available, 46 pts (7.8%) with a gBRCAm have been identified: 10 pts were known to have a gBRCAm at screening, while 36/580 (6.2%) had a newly identified gBRCAm. Outside the USA or Israel (where screened populations may be enriched for Ashkenazi Jews), a gBRCAm was newly identified in 23/568 pts (4%). The target number for randomization is ≈145 pts across ≈90 centers worldwide. Clinical trial information: NCT02184195.Country Screened (n) Spain 95 France 85 Korea 81 USA 75 Israel 73 UK 61 Italy 61 Germany 44 Australia 29 Belgium 7 Canada 6 Netherlands 4 Total 621* *The breakdown by country is based on an initial 621 pts screened.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapyFrench-language works237,207