Novel Approach to Avoid Manipulation of the Medial Pterygopalatine Fossa Contents during Surgical Management of Sphenoid Sinus Lateral Recess Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks: The Posterior Maxillary Sinus Window Technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endoscopic endonasal techniques for the management of the majority meningo(encephalo)celes and/or leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) into the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus have a high success rate with low complication rates. However, in certain cases, the aperture between the second branch of the trigeminal nerve (V2) and the Vidian nerve is too narrow to efficiently access the lateral recess from medially through the sphenoid sinus airspace. In these situations, it is thought necessary to expose and lateralize the pterygopalatine fossa contents to visualize the entirety of the skull base defect. In this setting, the manipulation of V2, vidian, and descending palatine nerves may be injured, leading to higher morbidity including dry eye and numbness of the ipsilateral palate and/or larger V2 innervation area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".