Effect of an innovative community-based care model, the Monarch Centre, on postpartum length of stay: an interrupted time-series study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reduction in postpartum length of stay has been advocated within a context of reducing health care system costs and maintaining quality of care. We assessed trends in postpartum length of stay for vaginal and cesarean deliveries at an academic hospital, The Ottawa Hospital, before and after the implementation in 2014 of a novel community-based postpartum outpatient clinic, the Monarch Centre. METHODS: The Monarch Centre model of postpartum care consists of prebooked appointments at the postpartum clinic, scheduled within 48 hours of hospital discharge. Clients receive maternal assessment including mood screening and care, neonatal care, laboratory testing including infant total serum bilirubin level, and breast-feeding assessment and support. Family physicians, lactation consultants and registered nurses are available for consultation at the appointment, and there is coordination with institutional care, community partners and primary care providers. We used interrupted time-series regression models to assess trends in postpartum length of stay at The Ottawa Hospital between January 2012 and December 2016. RESULTS: There were 16 023 deliveries with 16 515 babies born over the study period. The mean postpartum length of stay was 46 hours (66 h for cesarean deliveries and 37 h for vaginal deliveries). Eighteen months after implementation of the centre, the average length of stay following a cesarean birth had decreased by 20 hours, a relative reduction of 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.5 to 30.4); for vaginal deliveries, length of stay was reduced by 6 hours, a relative reduction of 18% (95% CI 5.2 to 31.1), and by 12 hours among typical cases (relative reduction 28%, 95% CI 19.2 to 36.6). There was a decrease in the proportion of women with a length of stay exceeding 48 hours after centre implementation. An increase in the rate of 30-day readmission from 1.1% to 1.9% was observed among babies. INTERPRETATION: A strong association was found between implementation of a community-based multidisciplinary postpartum clinic and declines in postpartum length of stay. This alternative model of postpartum care is safe, has the potential for reducing provider costs and should be considered for further implementation at provincial and national levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".