MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883431119 · doi:10.1002/jsfa.9240

Immunotoxicity of aflatoxin M<sub>1</sub>: as a potent suppressor of innate and acquired immune systems in a subacute study

2018· article· en· W2883431119 on OpenAlexaff
Kobra Shirani, Bamdad Riahi‐Zanjani, Mahmoud Mahmoudi, Amir Hossein Jafarian, Faezeh Vahdati Hassani, John P. Giesy, Gholamreza Karimi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersMashhad University of Medical SciencesIran National Science FoundationUniversity of Hong KongNanjing UniversityState Administration of Foreign Experts AffairsChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsInnate immune systemSpleenImmunologyImmune systemAntibodyImmunityAflatoxinIn vivoIn vitroTiterHemagglutinationBiologyChemistryBiochemistryFood scienceBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Although, to date, there have been several in vitro and in vivo studies of immunomodulatory effects of aflatoxin M 1 (AFB 1 ), little is known about the effect of AFM 1 on various aspects of innate and acquired immunity. In the present study, AFM 1 was administered intraperitoneally, at doses of 25 and 50 μg kg −1 , body mass for 28 days and various immunological parameters were measured. RESULTS Several parameters related to immune function were suppressed: organ mass, cellularity of spleen, proliferation response to lipopolysaccaride and phytohemagglutinin‐A, hemagglutination titer, delayed type of hypersensitivity response, spleen cell subtypes, serum hemolytic activity, serum immunoglobulin G level and cytokine production. AFM 1 did not cause changes in body mass, hematological parameters or the concentration of immunoglobulin M in blood serum. Conclusions Overall, the data suggested that AFM 1 suppressed innate and acquired immunity. Therefore, with respect to consumer safety, it is extremely important to further control the level of AFM 1 in milk, and this should be considered as a precedence for risk management actions. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Science of Food and AgricultureSame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207