MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883446184 · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2856768

A Data Imputation Model in Phasor Measurement Units Based on Bagged Averaging of Multiple Linear Regression

2018· article· en· W2883446184 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ngoc Thien Le, Watit Benjapolakul

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Texas at AustinChulalongkorn UniversityRyerson University
KeywordsImputation (statistics)Missing dataPhasor measurement unitComputer sciencePhasorLinear regressionData miningUnits of measurementRegressionBootstrapping (finance)StatisticsElectric power systemMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synchrophasor data from the phasor measurement unit (PMU) indicate the health of the electrical system. However, the PMU performance relies entirely on a supported communication network. The existing communication approaches do not guarantee the error-free channel for the PMU network. Meanwhile, the mean or median approaches are commonly used to impute the missing value. These methods, however, fail to recover some valuable frequency events. In this paper, we first proved the multiple linear regression features in many synchronized frequency data streams in the short-time window. Then, we proposed the Bagged Averaging of Multiple Linear Regression model, which handles and fulfills the missing values in synchronized frequency data measurement fast and efficiently. This technique was based on the ensemble learning by bootstrapping and averaging many multiple linear regressions to predict the missing values. Various experiments on the synchronized frequency measurement data from the Texas synchrophasor network have demonstrated the effectiveness of our proposed approach in recovering the missing frequency events. Our proposed approach guarantees the performance of real-time wide area monitoring system applications, such as frequency analysis or stability monitoring and trending.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207