Valsalva-triggered pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To report the clinical and radiologic features of 3 patients in whom prolonged vigorous coughing/Valsalva triggered the development of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome (PTCS) that persisted even after the coughing attacks had stopped and to discuss how this novel proximate trigger supports a “hydraulic model” of PTCS pathogenesis. Methods This was a retrospective case series of 3 patients seen between January 2011 and July 2017 in a tertiary care neuro-ophthalmology clinic. Results Three female patients (ages 13, 28, and 21 years) were asymptomatic until developing prolonged fits of profuse coughing. Two patients had upper respiratory tract infections, and 1 patient had a prolonged asthma exacerbation. Symptoms typical of PTCS began 2 weeks into the coughing attacks, and patients were examined 1 to 2 weeks after coughing had ceased. One patient was overweight and 2 were obese. All 3 patients had papilledema, and 1 of 3 patients had lateral rectus palsy. Two of 3 patients had visual field defects, and all 3 patients had dural venous sinus stenoses (DVSS) on venous imaging. Lumbar puncture (LP) confirmed elevated opening pressures in 2 of 3 patients and brought immediate and sustained relief of symptoms; LP attempts failed in the third patient because of body habitus (body mass index 68 kg/m2). All patients were given acetazolamide and advised to work on weight loss. At follow-up 3 to 6 months later, all 3 patients had complete remission of their clinical syndromes and resolution of their DVSS on neuroimaging. Conclusions In susceptible individuals, prolonged coughing/Valsalva can trigger PTCS in the setting of collapsible (nonfixed) DVSS. This new observation supports a hydraulic model of PTCS pathogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".