A design structure matrix approach for measuring co-change-modularity of software products
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several authors have quantified the modularity of software systems in terms of coupling and cohesion metrics. Most of these approaches focus on functional and procedural dependencies in the system. Although highly relevant at the design phase, these static dependencies alone do not account for how a software product evolves over time. Instead, this is also dictated by logical and hidden dependencies between system files. To a large extent, the co-change (co-commit) relation captures these different types of dependencies. In this paper, we define two measures of co-change-modularity of a software product based on a weighted design structure matrix (DSM). The first metric, called the weighted propagation cost, uses matrix exponential to measure how changes to one system file potentially affect the whole product. The second metric, called the weighted clustering cost, uses the output of the first metric to measure the partitionability of the system based on the co-change relation. In addition, we provide a visual representation of how the co-change structure of a system evolves over time. We discuss the theoretical foundation of our work and highlight its advantages over existing methodologies. We apply our approach to GNU Octave and show the findings to be consistent with the available literature on the evolution of Octave. Our analysis is extensible and applicable to a range of scenarios including open source systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".