MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883711541 · doi:10.1089/cbr.2018.2480

Evaluation of N-Succinimidyl S-Acetylthioacetate Ligand for Radiolabeling of Humanized Antibodies with <sup>188</sup> Rhenium

2018· article· en· W2883711541 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin J. Allen, Rubin Jiao, Mackenzie E. Malo, Ekaterina Dadachova

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsRadioimmunotherapyChemistryAntibodyConjugateConjugated systemRadiochemistryReagentChelationMonoclonal antibodyCancer researchMedicineImmunologyOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radioimmunotherapy offers an effective way to direct ionizing radiation to cancer cells through attachment of radionuclides to antibodies while limiting negative effects of off-target irradiation. This, however, requires effective facile methods for attachment of therapeutic radionuclides onto antibodies. Herein, the authors report their efforts in evaluating N-succinimidyl S-acetylthioacetate (SATA), a commercially available reagent, for use as a bifunctional chelating agent (BCA) to attach 188Rhenium (188Re) onto h8C3, a humanized IgG antibody that can effectively target extracellular melanin present in malignant melanoma. Micro single photon emission computer tomography/computer tomography was used to determine an effective timeline for antibody uptake in B16-F10 tumor bearing C57BL6 mice guiding the selection of 188Re with its 16.9 h physical half-life. Radio instant thin layer chromatography coupled with radio high-performance liquid chromatography was used to assess radioisotope incorporation, as well as stability during the labeling process for SATA conjugated h8C3. It was determined that despite the relatively mild conditions used, incorporation of the SATA conjugate resulted in antibody instability during labeling requiring a different BCA to facilitate rhenium incorporation onto the antibodies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Biotherapy and RadiopharmaceuticalsSame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207