MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cold Preservation with a Hyperbranched Polyglycerol-Based Solution Improves Functional Recovery of Kidney Transplants in a Pig Model

2018· article· en· W2883774566 on OpenAlexaffabout
Caigan Du, Shadan Li, Qiunong Guan, Irina Cafeeva, Donald E. Brooks, Jayachandran N. Kizhakkedathu, Christopher Nguan

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCold storageViaspanAutotransplantationTransplantationKidneyMedicineUrologyMachine perfusionKidney transplantationNephrectomyUrinePerfusionSurgeryBiologyInternal medicineLiver transplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Organ preservation solutions are used to limit donor organ injury during cold preservation (perfusion and storage) in organ transplantation, and hyperbranched polyglycerol (HPG) is a promising colloid for the solutions to improve donor organ protection. This study was to evaluate the outcomes of kidney transplants after cold preservation with a HPG-based organ preservation solution in a human-like model Materials and Methods The orthotopic kidney autotransplantation was performed in farm pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus, weighing 35–45 kg) under general anesthesia. The left kidney was perfused with and stored in either cold HPG-based organ preservation solution or cold UW solution, followed by autologous transplantation to the right side after right nephrectomy. The survival and function of transplanted kidneys were determined by using their primary outcome-urine production. Results The cold ischemia time in both groups (HPG versus UW) was similar (both median 7.625 hours, P = 0.9376, t-test, n=6). Within 7 days after transplantation, the survival of transplanted kidneys between these two groups was not significantly different (P = 0.09193, Log-rank test). The urine output from the first day post-transplantation in HPG group was 1593.33 ± 887.39 mL, which was significantly higher than 310.83 ± 419.48 mL in UW group (P = 0.0095, t-test, n = 6), and this difference was consistent when the urine production between the HPG and the UW groups was compared during the entire period of 7 days (P = 0.0002, two-way ANOVA, n = 6). Conclusion Our preliminary data show that as compared to the UW solution, the cold preservation of donor kidneys with the HPG solution has less negative impact on the immediate functional recovery of kidney transplants after transplantation in the pig model, which may suggest that the HPG solution likely improve donor kidney preservation, resulting in better outcomes for kidney transplants. This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Dr. Shadan Li received scholarship from the China Scholarship Council and funding support from General Hospital of Chengdu Military Command (Grant No.: 2016KC28), Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (Grant No.: 2017HH0073) and the Center of Donation After Cardiac Death, Center of Medical Science of Chengdu Military Command.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207