Ruptura do ligamento cruzado cranial de cães atendidos no Hovet da Universidade Anhembi Morumbi
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study is identify risk factors such as race, age, sex, body weight and spaying/ neutering in dogs that suffered rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament (RCCL), treated at Hovet Universidade Anhembi Morumbi. Records of cases of dogs treated with RCCL were surveyed in the 2009 – 2015 period. In the period studied, 382 animals were treated with RCCL, of which 189 were females and 193 males. There is no statistically significant difference between males and females at the age of neutering, age at rupture and in the interval between neutering and RLCCr. But there was a statistically significant difference in the average age at RCCL of animals over 20 kg compared to the others.It was concluded that there is influence of the animal weight in the occurrence of RLCCr, since animals with more than 20 kg presented the RLCCr with a lower age than the smaller animals. The races most affected by RLCCr were Pitbull, Poodle, Fila Brasileiro, Yorkshire, Rotweiler, Labrador and Lhasa Apso. As in this study there was no treatment of spaying/ neutering animals before puberty that presented RLCCr, it is necessary to investigate the influence of spaying/ neutering in prepubertal animals in the occurrence of RLCCr.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it