MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Megadose Bone Marrow and Regulatory T cells for the Induction of Immune Tolerance in Non-Human Primates Through Durable Mixed Hematopoietic Chimerism Across MHC-barriers

2018· article· en· W2883914496 on OpenAlexaff
Paula Alonso‐Guallart, Raimon Duran‐Struuck, Jeffrey Stern, Erik Berglund, Nathaly Llore, Jonah Zitsman, Genevieve Pierre, Sigal B. Kofman, Makenzie Danton, Samanta Gokova, Emily W. Lopes, Alicia N. McMurchy, Qizhi Tang, Megan K. Levings, Megan Sykes, Adam Griesemer

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone marrowHaematopoiesisMedicineImmune toleranceImmunologyImmune systemMajor histocompatibility complexStem cellBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction ?Mixed hematopoietic chimerism is a promising approach to achieving transplantation tolerance. Transient mixed chimerism (MC) leads to renal allograft tolerance in about 60% of Cynomolgus macaques (CM) when a donor kidney is co-transplanted with MHC-mismatched bone marrow (BMT). These findings are not recapitulated with other solid organs. The addition of regulatory T cells (Tregs) to BMT has promoted long-term MC and skin graft tolerance in mice. We aim to test the effect of high bone marrow dose and Treg administration with the hypothesis that these will enhance the duration and degree of donor MC in the CM model with the ultimate goal of inducing tolerance to any donor organ. Materials and Methods CM recipients were conditioned with total body irradiation (1.25Gy, days -6, -5), thymic irradiation (7Gy, day -1), ATGAM (days -2, -1, 0), anti-CD40L (days 0, 2, 5, 7, 9, 12) and rapamycin for 30 days (day -2 to 28) and tapered down thereafter. MHC-mismatched bone marrow (BM) was infused either on day 0 (Group A) or 2 (Group B) along with the first dose of polyclonal recipient Tregs. Consecutive Treg doses were given during the following week and on day (+/-) 50 for a total of five doses. Tregs were expanded either with artificial antigen presenting cells (aAPC) and donor PBMCs or CD40L-stimulated B cells. Results Animals received cell doses detailed in Figure 1. Among all the Treg-treated animals, 5/6 developed high and long-lasting MC (Figure 2). Among those, the animals that received Tregs stimulated with activated B cells achieved full donor chimerism, which in one was associated with biopsy-proven graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). The Treg recipient that lost chimerism earlier did so in association with substantial CMV viremia, and associated immune activation. Two of 4 controls lost MC early post-BMT. In one control the MC started to decrease at the time of sacrifice due to infection and the fourth control developed full donor chimerism and GVHD. In vitro, Treg treated animals were donor-hyporesponsive while chimeric.? Discussion Megadose BMT prolonged MC over historical controls that received lower doses of HSC. Prolonged MC was achieved in all the animals that received Tregs except for one with CMV reactivation, and those treated with Tregs generated with activated-B cells had full donor chimerism. In addition, one of the controls achieved full donor chimerism with GVHD. Conclusions Megadose BMT across MHC barriers prolongs donor MC. MC is further prolonged by administering expanded polyclonal recipient Tregs at the time of BMT. NIH R01 OD017949. S10RR027050. S10OD020056.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207