MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883929609 · doi:10.17870/bathspa.c.4967579

Very Clear Instructions (2018)

2020· article· en· W2883929609 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P Harrison

Bibliographic record

VenueResearchSPAce (Bath Spa University) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalletDanceVisual artsChoreographyConversationExhibitionGestureMovement (music)Action (physics)AestheticsArtNarrativeSociologyLiteratureCommunicationLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Very Clear Instructions is a performance rooted in a distillation of everyday gestures and routine. The performance grew out of an intensive sequence of improvisatory workshops, forming a true conversation between the visual art world of John Wood and Paul Harrison and that of the dance corps of Ballet BC. The performance was held Off-site at The Polygon Gallery, North Vancouver on Friday, April 20, 2018 and was a collaboration between artists John Wood and Paul Harrison, Ballet BC and The Contemporary Art Gallery, in partnership with The Polygon Gallery. Wood and Harrison have long been concerned with the body, characteristically employing a vocabulary that connects into the spatial concerns and material world of choreography and contemporary dance. They engage with attributes such as trust, cause and effect, action and reaction, and the physical arena and dimensions in which movement and gesture occurs with characteristic observations surrounding the human condition. This performance is structured as ten episodes such as “Falling”, “Right angles” or “Lean”, and combines much of their ongoing preoccupations with a keen delight, humour and reflection on human endeavour. The familiar is made charmingly and compellingly strange, altering our perceptions as we move through the world. This collection contains evidence of the output (videos of the performance) and contextualising information, including notes and rehearsals relating to the creation of the artwork, a 300 word statement, research timeline, and research questions. The work in this collection is under copyright and may not be used without permission. Use of this repository acknowledges cooperation with its policies and relevant copyright law.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6040.403

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearchSPAce (Bath Spa University)Same topicDiversity and Impact of DanceFrench-language works237,207