MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883945992 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2018.2852143

Sea Ice Sensing From GNSS-R Data Using Convolutional Neural Networks

2018· article· en· W2883945992 on OpenAlexafffund
Qingyun Yan, Weimin Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPixelConvolutional neural networkRemote sensingComputer scienceRadiometerSatelliteMicrowave imagingArtificial intelligenceImage resolutionArtificial neural networkComputer visionMicrowaveGeologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, a scheme that uses convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is proposed for sea ice detection and sea ice concentration (SIC) prediction from TechDemoSat-1 Global Navigation Satellite System Reflectometry delay-Doppler maps (DDMs). Specifically, a classification-orientated CNN was designed for sea ice detection and a regression-based one for SIC estimation. Here, DDM images were used as input, and SIC data from Nimbus-7 Scanning Multi-Channel Microwave Radiometer and Defense Meteorological Satellite Program Special Sensor Microwave Imager-Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounder sensors were modified as targeted output. In the experimental phase, the CNN output resulted from inputting full-size DDM data (128-by-20 pixels) showed better accuracy than that of the existing NN-based method. Besides, both CNNs and NNs with further processed input data (40-by-20 pixels, and with a fixed position in each image) were evaluated and the performance of both networks was enhanced. It was found that when DDM data are adequately preprocessed, CNNs and NNs share similar accuracy; otherwise the former outperforms the latter. Further conclusion was thus drawn that CNNs were more tolerant to the data format changes than NNs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations127
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing LettersSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207