MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884028601 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2018.271

24 Radiation induced meningioma in adult survivors of childhood leukemia or primary brain tumor treated with cranial radiotherapy: Incidence and screening recommendations

2018· article· en· W2884028601 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maryam Dosani, Jordan Tran, Jessica L. Conway, Karen Goddard

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiation therapyMedulloblastomaEpendymomaMeningiomaPrimitive neuroectodermal tumorCraniopharyngiomaCohortIncidence (geometry)SurgeryLeukemiaRadiologyInternal medicineChemotherapyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Cranial radiotherapy (CRT) was commonly given for childhood leukemia and brain tumors. Survivors are at risk of late effects including radiation induced meningioma (RIM). Surveillance for RIM is not standardized . We aimed to determine the incidence, latency, and screening patterns for RIM. Materials and Methods: Retrospective chart review of all patients aged <18 years at the time of radiation (RT), treated with CRT for leukemia or a brain tumor in BC between 1981-2006. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were collected. Actuarial statistics were calculated with Kaplan-Meier Curves. Patients were censored at the date of last normal cranial imaging, or development of a RIM. Results: 392 patients were identified. Median age (range) at CRT was 9.6 years. Median CRT dose was 28Gy. The original diagnosis was leukemia in 50%, glioma in 13%, medulloblastoma in 8%, ependymoma in 7%, neuroectodermal tumor in 7%, germ cell tumor in 5%, craniopharyngioma in 4%, and other pathologies in 6%. Median (range) of clinical follow-up (FU) was 13.2 (0-37.5) years. Median (range) of cranial imaging FU was 15.5 (0-21.2) years. There was no documented cranial imaging FU in 144 patients. Forty-eight patients developed a RIM. The median age (range) at RT for patients with RIM was 6.7 years. Only 8 of these cases presented with associated symptoms. The earliest RIM in our cohort occurred 10.2 years after CRT. On actuarial analysis, the median (95% CI) time to development of a meningioma was 29.8 (28.9-30.7) years. Incidence (95% CI) of meningioma at 10 years was 0%, 15 years was 5 (2-9)%, 20 years was 12 (6-18)%, 25 years was 33 (23-43)% and 30 years was 47 (37-68)%. Amongst patients with a RIM, the median dose of CRT was 45 Gy. The lowest dose of RT in a patient who developed RIM was 12 Gy. RT was delivered to the whole brain in 58% and partial brain in 42% of patients with a RIM. Conclusions: After CRT in pediatric patients, there is a significant risk of developing a RIM and a steady increase in this risk with ongoing follow-up. We recommend standardization of surveillance for these patients with screening beginning 10 years after completion of CRT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicMeningioma and schwannoma managementFrench-language works237,207