Medial prefrontal cortex population activity is plastic irrespective of learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The prefrontal cortex is thought to learn the relationships between actions and their outcomes. But little is known about what changes to population activity in prefrontal cortex are specific to learning these relationships. Here we characterise the plasticity of population activity in the medial prefrontal cortex of male rats learning rules on a Y-maze. First, we show that the population always changes its patterns of joint activity between the periods of sleep either side of a training session on the maze, irrespective of successful rule learning during training. Next, by comparing the structure of population activity in sleep and training, we show that this population plasticity differs between learning and non-learning sessions. In learning sessions, the changes in population activity in posttraining sleep incorporate the changes to the population activity during training on the maze. In non-learning sessions, the changes in sleep and training are unrelated. Finally, we show evidence that the non-learning and learning forms of population plasticity are driven by different neuron-level changes, with the non-learning form entirely accounted for by independent changes to the excitability of individual neurons, and the learning form also including changes to firing rate couplings between neurons. Collectively, our results suggest two different forms of population plasticity in prefrontal cortex during the learning of action-outcome relationships, one a persistent change in population activity structure decoupled from overt rule-learning, the other a directional change driven by feedback during behaviour. Significance statement The prefrontal cortex is thought to represent our knowledge about what action is worth doing in which context. But we do not know how the activity of neurons in prefrontal cortex collectively changes when learning which actions are relevant. Here we show in a trial-and-error task that population activity in prefrontal cortex is persistently changing, irrespective of learning. Only during episodes of clear learning of relevant actions are the accompanying changes to population activity carried forward into sleep, suggesting a long-lasting form of neural plasticity. Our results suggest that representations of relevant actions in prefrontal cortex are acquired by reward imposing a direction onto ongoing population plasticity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".