A pathway leading to a cation-binding pocket determines the selectivity of the NhaP2 antiporter in <i>Vibrio cholerae</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Vc-NhaP2 antiporter from Vibrio cholerae exchanges H+ for K+ or Na+ but not for the smaller Li+. The molecular basis of this unusual selectivity remains unknown. Phyre2 and Rosetta software were used to generate a structural model of the Vc-NhaP2. The obtained model suggested that a cluster of residues from different transmembrane segments (TMSs) forms a putative cation-binding pocket in the middle of the membrane: D133 and T132 from TMS V together with D162 and E157 of TMS VI. The model also suggested that L257, G258, and N259 from TMS IX together with T276, D273, Q280, and Y251 from TMS X as well as L289 and L342 from TMS XII form a transmembrane pathway for translocated ions with a built-in filter determining cation selectivity. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of the identified residues verified the model by showing that structural modifications of the pathway resulted in altered cation selectivity and transport activity. In particular, L257A, G258A, Q280A, and Y251A variants gained Li+/H+ antiport capacity that was absent in the nonmutated antiporter. T276A, D273A, and L289A variants exclusively exchanged K+ for H+, while a L342A variant mediated Na+/H+ exchange only, thus maintaining strict alkali cation selectivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".