Distribution of Boleteceous Mushrooms in India, Some New Records from Sal Forest of Central India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An account of Boleteceous mushrooms reported from different part of India is given. Total 84 species of Boletaceae were compiled from literature with records of habitat, distribution and references. Boletus spp. are the most common (37 species) followed by Strobilomyces (9 species), Tylopilus (7 species), Boletellus (6 species), Xerocomus (5 species), Suillus (3 species), Chalciporus, Retiboletus and Pulveroboletus (2 species each), Australoboletus, Borofutus, Hemileccinum, Hortiboletus, Leccinum. Octaviania, Phylloporus, Retiboletus, Rhodactina, Suillellus, Xerocomellus (one species each). Among Indian states, Himachal Pradesh and Sikkim represent the most boletes mushroom (16 species each) followed, Meghalaya (13), West Bengal (11), Madhya Pradesh and Uttarakhand (7 each), Jammu & Kashmir (5) Chhattisgarh and Kerala (4) and rest of states showed 3 or less number of species. Six species of boletes namely: Boletellus ananas, B. chrysenteroides, B. dissiliens, B. pseudochrysenteroides, B. corneri and Boletus edulis were recorded for the first time from sal forest of central India (Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh). These fungi are known to form ectomycorrizal association with sal trees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".