MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884190716 · doi:10.1049/iet-com.2017.0306

Protocol with self‐adaptive GB for BANs

2018· article· en· W2884190716 on OpenAlexaff
Tong Bai, Jinzhao Lin, Yu Pang, Guoquan Li, Zhangyong Li, Huiqian Wang, Junchao Wang, Željko Žilić

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Communications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkTransceiverNode (physics)Energy consumptionTransmission (telecommunications)Guard (computer science)Wireless sensor networkSensor nodeQuality of serviceReal-time computingTelecommunicationsKey distribution in wireless sensor networksWirelessEngineeringWireless networkElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Body area networks (BANs) are systems of wearable computing devices for long‐term monitoring of personal health care. BAN is an emerging technology for the worldwide ageing population. In the BAN system, the transceiver is the most energy‐consuming part of a sensor node and radio transmission in the vicinity of the human body is highly lossy and inefficient. Therefore, the energy of the sensor node constraints the life cycle and quality of service of the network; consequently, low‐cost protocol shaves attracted wide interest. This study proposes a frame structure model of a self‐adaptive guard band protocol, which introduces a GB in each time slot according to the allowed maximum time drift of the crystal, adaptively adjusts the value of the GB based on the actual time drift, and then ensures that the node simultaneously maintains the sleeping state and synchronisation with the coordinator during beacon transmission, thus reducing the energy consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET CommunicationsSame topicWireless Body Area NetworksFrench-language works237,207