Research on the Inheritance and Transcendence of Confucian Thoughts of “Grand Union” by the Concept of “A Community of Shared Future for Mankind”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the 21st century today, economic globalization and the advent of an information age have greatly unleashed and boosted productive forces. They have presented unprecedented opportunities while make climate change, ecological imbalances, financial risks, refugee crises, and major infectious diseases cross the national borders to become a global challenge for humanity. The Chinese communists headed by Xi Jinping, through in-depth analysis and rational thinking of the historical trend, the trend of current times, and the law of human civilization development, have put forward the concept of “a community of shared future for mankind” .With peace, development, cooperation, and win-win as its core value, the concept is a “China solution” to meet global challenges, to safeguard world peace, and to promote the common development of all countries. It also represents “Chinese Wisdom” and “Chinese Responsibility” as a rising power in the world. The concept of “a community of shared future for mankind” is rooted in the broad and profound Chinese traditional culture and is a scientific prediction based on the characteristics of the times and the direction of the development of human society. In September 2017, the 8th World Conference on Confucianism was opened in Qufu, Shandong Province, hometown of Confucius. Domestic and foreign experts conducted discussions on the theme of “Confucian Thoughts and A Community of Shared Future for Mankind”. Zhu Jieren, President of the Chinese Historical Literature Research Association, as one of participating experts, mentioned: “Confucius, in his era, had proposed the idea of “Grand Union” and in his thought, mankind is a community of shared future.” (Li, 2017) Confucian thoughts of “Grand Union” is precisely coincides with the concept of “a community of shared future for mankind” both in values and pursuits. If the “Grand Union” thought is the pursuit of Chinese ancient thinker for an ideal human society, then the concept of “a community of shared future for mankind” is the pursuit of Chinese communists for a peaceful and progressing world (Sun, 2016). Based on common pursuits and values, the two thoughts are proposed based on different historical backgrounds and realistic conditions. Therefore, it is of great realistic and practical significance that by analyzing and comparing the two thoughts, the innovation and internationalization of Confucianism studies can be greatly promoted and the construction of a community of shared future for mankind can be also pushed forward.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.097 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.019 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".