Association between maternal body mass index in early pregnancy and anorexia nervosa in daughters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The etiology of anorexia nervosa is poorly understood. Although genetic factors play a major role, maternal factors, and obstetric complications are possible environmental causes. We investigated the association between maternal overweight and obesity in early pregnancy and risk of anorexia nervosa in daughters. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including all live singleton females born in Sweden from 1992 through 2002. Anorexia nervosa diagnosis was identified by using the nation-wide Swedish Patient and Cause of Death Registers. Multivariable Cox hazards regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% CIs, adjusting for confounders. Stratified Cox regressions were applied to data on siblings to adjust for unmeasured familial confounding. RESULTS: Among 486,688 live singleton females, 2,414 (0.50%) were diagnosed with anorexia nervosa through 2012. The aHR of anorexia nervosa decreased linearly by maternal BMI (p-value for trend < .001). When compared with daughters of normal weight mothers (body mass index [BMI] 18.5-24.9), aHRs (95%CI) of anorexia nervosa were 0.74 (0.65-0.84) in daughters of overweight mothers (BMI 25-29.9) and 0.61 (0.47-0.78) in daughters of mothers with obesity Grade I (BMI 30-34.9). In sibling control analysis, no associations were observed between maternal BMI and aHRs of anorexia nervosa in offspring. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of anorexia nervosa decreased with maternal overweight and obesity in a dose-response manner. However, the sibling control analysis suggests that these findings are not consistent with causals effects of maternal BMI on anorexia nervosa in offspring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".