Extremely Fast Hydrogen Atom Transfer between Nitroxides and HOO<b>·</b> Radicals and Implication for Catalytic Coantioxidant Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a novel coantioxidant system based on TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical) that, in biologically relevant model systems, rapidly converts chain-carrying alkylperoxyl radicals to HOO · . Extremely efficient quenching of HOO · by TEMPO blocks the oxidative chain. Rate constants in chlorobenzene were measured to be 1.1 × 10 9 M –1 s –1 for the reductive reaction TEMPO + HOO · → TEMPOH + O 2 and 5.0 × 10 7 M –1 s –1 for the oxidative reaction TEMPOH + HOO · → TEMPO + H 2 O 2 . These rate constants are significantly higher than that associated with the reaction of HOO· with α-tocopherol, Nature’s best lipid soluble antioxidant ( k = 1.6 × 10 6 M –1 s –1 ). These data show that in the presence of ROO · -to-HOO · chain-transfer agents, which are common in lipophilic environments, the TEMPO/TEMPOH couple protects organic molecules from oxidation by establishing an efficient reductive catalytic cycle. This catalytic cycle provides a new understanding of the efficacy of the antioxidant capability of TEMPO in nonaqueous systems and its potential to act as a chemoprotective against radical damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".