MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884353788 · doi:10.1080/21691401.2018.1489270

Novel microencapsulated probiotic blend for use in metabolic syndrome: design and <i>in-vivo</i> analysis

2018· article· en· W2884353788 on OpenAlexaff
Umar Iqbal, Susan Westfall, Satya Prakash

Bibliographic record

VenueArtificial Cells Nanomedicine and Biotechnology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbioticMetabolic syndromeDiabetes mellitusTriglycerideFood scienceCholesterolFenofibrateIn vivoMedicineBiologyPharmacologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiotechnologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing prevalence of the metabolic syndrome has made it a medical issue that currently affects 1 in 5 Canadians. The metabolic syndrome is defined by risk factors that predispose an individual to diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Current forms of interventions have been inadequate as substantiated by the fact that the prevalence of metabolic syndrome has not reduced over the years. The objective of this study was to investigate the therapeutic benefits of a novel microencapsulated probiotic blend in treating the metabolic syndrome. Three probiotic strains were microencapsulated into alginate-polylysine-alginate (APA) microcapsules: L. rhamnosus NCIMB 6375, L. plantarum NCIMB 8826 and L. fermentum NCIMB 5221. From the results, it was observed that the microencapsulated probiotic blend significantly reduced serum total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels (reducing from 516 mg/dL to 379 mg/dL, 314 mg/dL to 231 mg/dL and 580 mg/dL to 270 mg/dL, respectively). In addition, the administration of the microencapsulated probiotic blend was found to favourably influence the gut microbiota, decreasing Firmicutes levels and increasing Bacteroidetes levels. Overall, this work demonstrates the potential a microencapsulated probiotic blend could have in targeting multiple risk factors of the metabolic syndrome; however, greater research is still needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtificial Cells Nanomedicine and BiotechnologySame topicGut microbiota and healthFrench-language works237,207