Sex Differences in Cardiac Troponin Testing in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Chest Pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elevated cardiac troponin (cTn), with signs/symptoms of ischemia, is a key element in a diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). Underdiagnosis of MI in women has been attributed to atypical symptoms, inconsistent ECG findings, and less diagnostic testing. We sought to determine if there are sex differences in cTn testing following presentation to the emergency department (ED) with a chief complaint of ischemic chest pain (CP) and if presentation affects diagnostic assessment. METHODS: All adults presenting to six hospital EDs in the Vancouver, Canada with a chief complaint of ischemic CP from 2009 to 2013 were included. The highest cTn level within 24 hours of ED presentation was used. CP was classified into cardiac- or respiratory dominant based on standard Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale coding. Chi-square testing was used to test for sex differences in CP categories and cTn testing within 24 hours. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between sex, cTn testing, and CP categories. RESULTS: Of 27,063 patients with ischemic CP, cardiac presentation was more common in men than women, irrespective of age. Among cardiac CP, 24.7% of men were <50 years compared to 18.2% of women; however, more women (19.9%) than men (11.6%) were >80 years. Overall, women were 1.8% less likely to have cTn testing; in patients <50 years, testing was markedly lower in women compared to men [odds ratio, OR (95% confidence intervals, CI) 0.78 (0.70-0.87)]. The odds of cardiac catheterization within 90 days of ED presentation were lower in women [OR, (95% CI) 0.52 (0.44-0.63)]. Even with cardiac CP, 17.7% of women versus 32.7% of men had cardiac catheterization. CONCLUSIONS: In men and women presenting to the ED with ischemic CP, cTn testing overall is similar except among young women under 50 years old, where it is markedly lower. Women undergo less cardiac catheterization, irrespective of CP type.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".