Self-channelled high harmonic generation of water window soft x-rays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Owing to the increasing significance of high harmonic generation (HHG) as a tabletop coherent x-ray source and the coming of age of intense infrared (IR) lasers, the development of high brightness soft x-ray beamlines is gaining a lot of attention. We discuss the self-guided propagation of high energy IR pulses around 1.8 μ m centre wavelength being loosely focused into a long, high-pressure gas cell. A bright x-ray beam with photon energies extending up to the oxygen K-edge at 543 eV is achieved with a flux of 2.9 × 10 3 photons/shot/1% bandwidth around the carbon K-edge (280 eV). We provide experimental and numerical evidence of an ionization steady state condition in the generation medium causing self-channelling and intensity clamping of the driving field. While the later limits the HHG cut-off energy for a given driving field wavelength, self-channelling increases the HHG flux through a longer, phase-matched, interaction length and provides a well-collimated HHG beam covering more than three octaves from <50 to 550 eV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".