Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives :This study was performed to evaluate the difference of effect between Soyeom pharmacopuncture and Jungsongouhyul pharmacopuncture on acute whiplash injury by traffic accident. Methods :The clinical study was conducted to acute whiplash injury patients who had admitted in Woosuk University Hospital from December 1, 2010 to February 29, 2012. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In one group, patients were treated with the oriental medicine therapy and Soyeom pharmacopuncture therapy. And in the other group, patients were treated with the oriental medicine therapy and Jungsongouhyul pharmacopuncture therapy. To estimate the efficacy of treatments use McGill pain questionnaire-short form(SF-MPQ), Visual analogue scale(VAS) and Neck disability index(NDI). Results :Both group represented effective improvement in SF-MPQ, VAS and NDI of posterior neck pain and no statistical significance difference. Conclusions :Through this study, Soyeom pharmacopuncture and Jungsongouhyul pharmacopuncture therapy is considered to be effective for reducing pain in acute whiplash injury patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".