MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884629458 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2018.66

Intraneural Ganglion Cysts of the Fibular Nerve: A Cause of Fluctuating Painful Foot Drop

2018· letter· en· W2884629458 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Pierre R. Bourque, Kirsty U Boyd, Gerard H. Jansen, Jodi Warman‐Chardon, Jocelyn Zwicker, Elizabeth Pringle, Kawan Rakhra, Ari Breiner

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFoot (prosody)GanglionFoot dropAnatomyContent (measure theory)SurgeryArtMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fibular neuropathy, Intraneural ganglion cystFoot drop due to fibular (peroneal) neuropathy at the knee may be caused by direct trauma, external compression, or structural (intrinsic or extrinsic) mass lesions.We present here an unusual presentation of intraneural ganglion cyst.A 64-year-old female presented to our clinic for evaluation.She had no significant past medical history, and was able to run 10 km until the time of clinical presentation.The first symptom was a burning and stabbing discomfort in the upper lateral left calf region.She also noted a mild and intermittent foot drop, which was aggravated by walking or jogging.Nerve conduction studies done 6 months later showed partial and non-localized motor and sensory axonal loss in the common fibular nerve territory.Foot drop improved spontaneously with avoidance of strenuous activity.She presented for reassessment in 18 months after initial onset, reporting that her foot drop had markedly worsened.There was Medical Research Council grade 1/5 weakness of left ankle dorsiflexion and eversion, with sparing of ankle inversion and plantar flexion.There was mild hypoesthesia and allodynia along the left lateral calf and dorsum of the foot.Nerve conduction studies were repeated, showing more severe axonal loss in the deep (motor) and superficial (sensory) branches of the fibular nerve, without conduction slowing across the fibular head.An axonal process in

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0060.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207