MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884730331 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v41i11a03

Summary of the Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT) Statement on Travelers’ Diarrhea

2015· article· en· W2884730331 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTravel-related health issues
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsRifaximinMedicineLoperamideTraveler's diarrheaAzithromycinDiarrheaAlternative medicineEnvironmental healthFamily medicineInternal medicineAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Most travellers' diarrhea (TD) infections occur during travel to low-and middle-income countries.Type of travel, duration of stay, age of traveller and presence of certain medical conditions are important factors to consider for risk of TD.The Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT) assembled a TD working group to develop recommendations on prevention and treatment of TD in travellers.This document is a summary of the Statement on Travellers' Diarrhea.Methods: Following a systematic review of the literature, recommendations on the prevention and treatment of TD were developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to evaluate data quality, benefits and harms of the intervention, and values and preferences of the traveller.Other recommendations were based on a review of the literature and expert opinion.Recommendations: Using the GRADE methodology, CATMAT concluded that oral cholera vaccine should not be routinely recommended to prevent TD in Canadian travellers.This recommendation was based on moderate quality data that showed this vaccine was not effective in preventing TD in travellers compared to placebo.Bismuth subsalicylate (BSS), fluoroquinolones or rifaximin are options for the prevention of TD based on high-quality data for BSS and fluoroquinolones and moderate evidence for rifaximin.For the treatment of TD, loperamide (alone or in combination with antibiotics), fluoroquinolones, azithromycin and rifaximin are all options, with varying degrees of data quality.Based on available evidence and expert opinion, CATMAT recommends handwashing or the use of hand sanitizer, as well as prudent choice and preparation of food and beverages as best practices for preventing diarrhea while travelling.At this time, a recommendation cannot be made for either the use of probiotics and prebiotics to prevent TD or the use of BSS to treat TD due to insufficient available evidence. Conclusion:With the exception of BSS for prevention of TD (strong recommendation for use), CATMAT conditionally recommends the use of each of the other GRADE-evaluated preventive and therapeutic products assessed in this Statement.These CATMAT recommendations should be considered as options in the prevention and treatment of TD based on the particular situation of the traveller. PreambleThe Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT) provides the Public Health Agency of Canada with ongoing and timely medical, scientific, and public health advice relating to tropical infectious disease and health risks associated with international travel.The Agency acknowledges that the advice and recommendations set out in this Statement are based upon the best current available scientific knowledge and medical practices, and is disseminating this document for information purposes to both travellers and the medical community caring for travellers.Persons administering or using drugs, vaccines or other products should also be aware of the contents of the product monograph(s) or other similarly approved standards or instructions for use.Recommendations for use and other information set out herein may differ from that set out in the product monograph(s) or other

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.078
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.078
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0100.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2015
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease ReportSame topicTravel-related health issuesFrench-language works237,207