MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884758452 · doi:10.1177/0021998318786785

Thermal cycle effects on laminated composite plates containing voids

2018· article· en· W2884758452 on OpenAlexaff
Shambhu Kumar Gupta, Mehdi Hojjati

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Composite Materials · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceVoid (composites)Composite materialComposite numberThermalTemperature cyclingFinite element methodAutoclaveTransverse planeShear (geology)Structural engineeringMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Composite structures are often cured in an autoclave to acquire the required space grade quality. Now the industry is focusing on the out of autoclave manufacturing method which leads to more voids inside laminate with respect to those manufactured in the autoclave. In the present work, the influence of voids on microcrack formation under thermal cycling and environmental conditions was analyzed. Thermal cycle experiments were performed using liquid nitrogen and oven, followed by microscopic observation of the polished cross-section of the 90° layered plies. Cracks were monitored, counted, and measured with respect to void and void free areas. Void content was characterized using microscopic and ImageJ software was used. It was observed that the microcracks will be formed both around the voids and in void free areas. As the number of thermal cycle increases, the number of microcrack around the voids increases much faster than compared to the void free areas. Also it was observed that most of microcracks were propagated in the transverse direction. Interlaminar shear strength was measured. Results indicate that interlaminar shear strength reduces as the number of cycle rises due to the increase in the microcrack density. Finite element method was used to simulate the process. The micro, meso, and macro model were created with respect to original samples voids and positions to calculate the stress distribution and its concentration. Good agreement between experiment and simulation was observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Composite MaterialsSame topicMechanical Behavior of CompositesFrench-language works237,207