MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Temporal shifts in controls over methane emissions from a boreal bog

2018· article· en· W2884779156 on OpenAlexafffund
Mei Wang, Jianghua Wu, Peter M. Lafleur, Junwei Luan, Huai Chen, Xinbiao Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultural and Forest Meteorology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaTrent UniversityCanadian Forest ServiceMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersInstitute for Biodiversity, Ecosystem Science, and Sustainability
KeywordsEddy covarianceEcosystem respirationEnvironmental scienceGrowing seasonFlux (metallurgy)PeatAtmospheric sciencesBogBorealSeasonalityWater tableEcosystemHydrology (agriculture)EcologyChemistryBiologyGeologyGroundwater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We measured year-round landscape-scale methane (CH4) flux in a boreal bog from May 2014 to April 2016 using the eddy covariance technique. The objectives of the study were to investigate the controls on CH4 flux at different periods of the growing season and to quantify the annual CH4 flux budget. The daily average growing season water table (WT) ranged from -0.33 to −0.08 m in 2014 and from −0.36 to −0.08 m in 2015. Strong seasonal variability in the daily average CH4 fluxes was observed in both 2014 and 2015, ranging from near zero before May to a peak of above 20 nmol m−2 s−1 in the middle-late August in 2014 and in the early-middle September in 2015. Soil temperature at 50 cm and water table exerted interactive impact on the seasonal variation in the daily average growing season CH4 flux in both years. Soil temperature at 1 cm was negatively related to CH4 flux when water table dropped more than 0.25 m below the peat surface in 2015 growing season, suggesting that the seasonal variation in CH4 flux was dominated by the variation due to CH4 oxidation. During the non-growing season, the daily variation in CH4 fluxes was mostly related to friction velocity in both years. In addition, daily average CH4 flux was linearly related to net ecosystem exchange of CO2 (NEE) when daily NEE was negative (i.e., days with CO2 uptake larger than ecosystem respiration), but there was no correlation between them when NEE was positive (days with ecosystem respiration dominated over CO2 uptake) during the growing season. We found that this boreal bog acted as a small CH4 source of 3.7 ± 0.9 g CH4 m−2 from May 2014 to April 2015 and 3.1 ± 0.9 g CH4 m−2 from May 2015 to April 2016. These values were at the lower end of the range of CH4 emission rates reported for boreal peatlands. Non-growing season CH4 emissions accounted for 41% (the first study year) and 39% (the second study year) of the annual emissions, highlighting the importance of non-growing season CH4 emissions in estimating the annual CH4 budget and the feedback to climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricultural and Forest MeteorologySame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207