Summary of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization’s Update on the recommended human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine immunization schedule
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are the most common sexually transmitted infections.In the absence of vaccination, it is estimated that 75% of sexually active Canadians will have a sexually transmitted HPV infection at some point in their lives.Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) has recommended a three-dose immunization schedule with HPV vaccine for females 9 years of age and older and for males between 9 and 26 years of age, since 2007 and 2012, respectively.Objective: To outline the evidence on a two-dose HPV vaccine schedule and to make recommendations for the optimal HPV immunization schedule in Canada.Methods: NACI reviewed the evidence used by the World Health Organization's (WHO's) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization for the two-dose HPV immunization schedule recommended for immunocompetent girls 9 to 14 years of age and conducted an additional review of literature for studies not included in, or published after, the SAGE review.A knowledge synthesis was performed then NACI approved specific recommendations and elucidated the rationale and relevant considerations.Results: Based on the evidence available to date, a two-dose HPV immunization schedule among immunocompetent 9-to 14-year-olds is expected to provide similar protective efficacy compared to a three-dose schedule in immunocompetent individuals aged 9 to 26 years.While all studies reviewed included only females, there is no reason to believe that the data would be different in males, given that data from three-dose trials demonstrates similar immune responses.Administration of two doses of HPV vaccine rather than three may increase acceptability by students, parents and health care professionals alike, and may lead to improved HPV immunization coverage and efficiencies by public health agencies.The duration of protection of either two doses or three doses of HPV vaccine is not yet known; research is encouraged to determine whether there is need for a booster dose.Conclusion: Based on the evidence available to date, a two-dose HPV immunization schedule (given at least six months apart) among immunocompetent 9-to 14-year-olds may be considered by individuals and jurisdictions to allow for potential cost savings and other individual and programmatic advantages.A three-dose schedule should be used in individuals 15 years of age and older, as well as immunocompromised individuals and immunocompetent HIV-infected individuals.The new and complete set of current recommendations for HPV vaccines will be published in the updated HPV chapter in the Canadian Immunization Guide in the near future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.025 | 0.086 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".